No copyright mark in source code
One more that don't understand or don't want to follow the GPL rules.
It can be a mistake from the owner of that website, and why I say that is because he/she don't know how many Meta keywords the search engine look for
Look on the sourse code.
But I think he/she is to stupid and thought no one will se that he/she has removed the Copyright and think he/she has built the app
It's actually not fun, someone should be mad!!
It can be a mistake from the owner of that website, and why I say that is because he/she don't know how many Meta keywords the search engine look for
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01705/017054ebc10c62a71bcc675258089781b0f2159d" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01705/017054ebc10c62a71bcc675258089781b0f2159d" alt="Laughing :lol:"
But I think he/she is to stupid and thought no one will se that he/she has removed the Copyright and think he/she has built the app
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01705/017054ebc10c62a71bcc675258089781b0f2159d" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01705/017054ebc10c62a71bcc675258089781b0f2159d" alt="Laughing :lol:"
It's actually not fun, someone should be mad!!
if you go to login.php you have all copyrightsBut I think he/she is to stupid and thought no one will se that he/she has removed the Copyright and think he/she has built the app
http://www.studmed.dk Portal for doctors and medical students in Denmark
Actually, he is within his rights. What you see in the browser is a layout, style and content that he created and so he can copyright that. All he is doing is stating that what you see is his copyright, he is not infringing on phpwcms license and copyright.
The CMS only stores the content, layout and style info and serves them to the viewer's browsers. This is equivalent to listening to a copyright song created by an artist, played on a copyright device produced by a manufacturer.
If he were to serve up any content or piece of software created by Oliver, such as the admin panel, then he could not place his copyright on that.
The CMS only stores the content, layout and style info and serves them to the viewer's browsers. This is equivalent to listening to a copyright song created by an artist, played on a copyright device produced by a manufacturer.
If he were to serve up any content or piece of software created by Oliver, such as the admin panel, then he could not place his copyright on that.
Ok then I can be wrong. Is it ok to remove the the copyrigth:
"phpwcms | open source web content management system
developed by Oliver Georgi (http://www.webverbund.de)
released under The GNU General Public License
visit project page: http://www.phpwcms.de
Release: 1.1-RC4 01-05-2004"
from the source code ?
"phpwcms | open source web content management system
developed by Oliver Georgi (http://www.webverbund.de)
released under The GNU General Public License
visit project page: http://www.phpwcms.de
Release: 1.1-RC4 01-05-2004"
from the source code ?
well I didnt say it was okay....Jari wrote:Thanks for the answer, then I know I was right and Frold and Marco was wrong
What I comment was:
whan saying app I meaning the backend but the backend still have full credit.has removed the Copyright and think he/she has built the app
http://www.studmed.dk Portal for doctors and medical students in Denmark
Ok, Im Backend alle Copyright Notizen Müssen bleiben login.php,
Auch Copyright Notice1 im frontend index.php, Notize1 ist also klar bezeichnet und muss bleiben.
Bedeutet das, dass weiter unten im Frontend index.php nach 'page_start' die zweite copyright notize entfernt werden kann?
Weil die o.e Seite diese zweite Notize nicht hat, ist dass ew. erlaubt?
Auch Copyright Notice1 im frontend index.php, Notize1 ist also klar bezeichnet und muss bleiben.
Bedeutet das, dass weiter unten im Frontend index.php nach 'page_start' die zweite copyright notize entfernt werden kann?
Weil die o.e Seite diese zweite Notize nicht hat, ist dass ew. erlaubt?