www.pixorium.com - your photo coach
www.pixorium.com - your photo coach
I recently launched http://www.pixorium.com.
Hi Ben,
nice touch to it, you're in the vista-design mood (or 4 purists, Mac-alike) , let's make it "glassy"
And Rico...aaah, rico
Faq that! 
Cool site, little but seems effective, as always respect from Brussels
Cheers
nice touch to it, you're in the vista-design mood (or 4 purists, Mac-alike) , let's make it "glassy"



Cool site, little but seems effective, as always respect from Brussels

Cheers
1.3 out, testing, testing...
Sponsoring 4 phpwcms Blog and Usermanagement
Sponsoring 4 phpwcms Blog and Usermanagement
Hey Ben,
it's a great site.
just wondering what is that of the FAQ page function, click on the title and the content grow, how to do that?
hope someone points me to the right direction.
I'm a newbie, don't even know the name of it, so unable to search it anywhere.
thanks in advance for any advice.
KIer
it's a great site.
just wondering what is that of the FAQ page function, click on the title and the content grow, how to do that?
hope someone points me to the right direction.
I'm a newbie, don't even know the name of it, so unable to search it anywhere.
thanks in advance for any advice.
KIer
Thanks everyone for your kind words! I'm glad you like the design.
@trip - I really appreciate your feedback on the footer text. I shrunk it a hair and lightened the text.
@Kosse - Good eye! You're right ... I used Rico Accordion instead of moo.fx (more on this in a minute)
@zed (or anyone with Safari) - is the contact form still exploding the layout in Safari? If so, could you PM me a screenshot?
@KIer - I actually used Rico Accordion ( http://www.openrico.org/rico/demos.page ... _accordion ) instead of Mad4Milk's moo.fx. While they both make use of prototype.js, Rico seemed a bit faster ... especially on slower computers or video cards with less memory. I think the reason moo.fx is a bit slower (at least in my experience) is because it both animates and fades out/in the text. Also, as I remember, Rico seemed to work in a certain browser where moo.fx didn't.
@trip - I really appreciate your feedback on the footer text. I shrunk it a hair and lightened the text.
@Kosse - Good eye! You're right ... I used Rico Accordion instead of moo.fx (more on this in a minute)
@zed (or anyone with Safari) - is the contact form still exploding the layout in Safari? If so, could you PM me a screenshot?
@KIer - I actually used Rico Accordion ( http://www.openrico.org/rico/demos.page ... _accordion ) instead of Mad4Milk's moo.fx. While they both make use of prototype.js, Rico seemed a bit faster ... especially on slower computers or video cards with less memory. I think the reason moo.fx is a bit slower (at least in my experience) is because it both animates and fades out/in the text. Also, as I remember, Rico seemed to work in a certain browser where moo.fx didn't.