Page 1 of 1

What are the advantages of ImageMagick?

Posted: Mon 30. Jan 2006, 11:25
by MPerio
Hello,

I use phpwcms and I'm happy.

My webhoster doesn't support ImageMagick. What are the dvantages of ImageMagick, because I consider to change my webhoster.

Thanks

Thomas

Posted: Mon 30. Jan 2006, 19:18
by DeXXus
Here's a little bit:
Not all of these are taken advantage of in phpWCMS:

-capable of higher quality thumbnails
-higher amount of different image formats that it can support
-many more configurable parameters (for transparency, etc.)
-batch processing capabilities
-you can call scripts (external to phpWCMS) that can take advantage of these features and enhance web page rendering.

Posted: Mon 30. Jan 2006, 19:25
by Kosse
DeXXus wrote:Here's a little bit:
Not all of these are taken advantage of in phpWCMS:

-capable of higher quality thumbnails
-higher amount of different image formats that it can support
-many more configurable parameters (for transparency, etc.)
-batch processing capabilities
-you can call scripts (external to phpWCMS) that can take advantage of these features and enhance web page rendering.
I do agree with DeXXus (he's a crack ;) , in my own experience, Imagemagick handles thumbnails and image resizing better (cleaner and smoother)
but... (there's always a but ;) ... most providers won't allow you to install Imagemagick because it requires special configs (on root) they don't like to make (dunno why, guess it has to do with stronger security issues, but I don't know) :? anyway, I use GD2 and all is well, you hardly notice the difference.

Cheers

Posted: Mon 30. Jan 2006, 19:43
by DeXXus
Kosse wrote:I use GD2 and all is well, you hardly notice the difference.

This is ~absolutely~ right 8)
Mine was installed (by me) using shell access.