guys - my 5 cents
i totally agree for the new name.
the name has to be
- cool and possibly short (calling it KOBRAMEPGGHFFS would make it even worse)
- without cliches like "design, code, php, cms" and stuff like that; they are a definitive turn off and anonymizer. A name has to be a name: my father has called me fulvio, not "thefatguythatmakessitesandrecordswetware"

- for perfect branding, it shouldn't mean anything in no language (negative examples: citroen NOVA, which in spanish is NO VA, doesn't works, or the danish mineral water PSCHITT... bad name to ask on an international table - "bring me some fresh pschitt!")
you might even say: why don't you give it a try?
i'm still thinking of it - but i'm thinking about the 5 chars consonant-vowel-consonant-vowel-consonant scheme, which is told to bring luck to industries. One example? The eastman industries, which rose to a pretty new level when changing their name into KODAK.... might have heard that name....
(curiously - another example... LENIN... same principle, different purpose)
let's try harder, guys..
