Oliver,
Addition to your suggestion to do:
.table_class {width: 300px;}
If I did this the image list appears OK, but in other pages where I use text + image (in text, right aligned) the image gets also a table of 300 pixels. If the pic itself is only 150 pix wide, it will align left and leave a blank space of 150 pixels on the rightside. And the page looks messed up.
I tried:
.table_class {width: 1px;}
And than both imagelist AND other pages with text + images appear OK. I was wondering why you choose .table_class {width: 300px;} where .table_class {width: 1px;} is better.
Or do I miss something?
ARTICLE type: Images --> patch 17-2 BUG!!
- Oliver Georgi
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9900
- Joined: Fri 3. Oct 2003, 22:22
- Contact:
- Oliver Georgi
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9900
- Joined: Fri 3. Oct 2003, 22:22
- Contact:
yes - absolute normal.
What you have done with .table_class {width: 1px;} is to say the browser to minimize the table to a width of 1px. But your images are wider than 1px that's why this is the new table limit.
Often it's better to set the no fixed width - then use .table_class {width: 1%;} - more optimal to the browser it defines browser should check for best width.
Oliver
What you have done with .table_class {width: 1px;} is to say the browser to minimize the table to a width of 1px. But your images are wider than 1px that's why this is the new table limit.
Often it's better to set the no fixed width - then use .table_class {width: 1%;} - more optimal to the browser it defines browser should check for best width.
Oliver