Berufsschule Koblenz

Executter · Post by **Executter** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 01:08

Jo, die Seite einer meiner Kunden ist eben fertig geworden und da ich es mit phpwcms gemacht habe, möchte ich die Euch keines Falls vorbehalten:

http://www.bbs-technik-koblenz.de/page

Ich habe nur das Grundgerüst gemacht, den Content macht der Kunde selbst.
Es geht aber um das Design. Man beachte die verschiedenen Motive der Hauptmenüpunkte

Für den Content den der Kunde erstellt bin ich nicht verantwortlich.
Auf den Seiten ohne Content gibt es im Internet Explorer Anzeigefehler.

Freundliche Grüße
Executter

-------------------------------------------------------

For english speaking visitors:
(completely translatet with google.de ^^)

Jo the side of one of my customers is not became evenly finished and I it there with phpwcms made, would like I you a case to reserve:
http://www.bbs-technik-koblenz.de/page

I made only the basic structure, makes the content the customer. It concerns however the Design. One considers the different motives of the points of main menue

For the content that the customer provided I am not responsible.

Jari · Post by **Jari** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 01:50

Not too bad but as usually make the width so it fits the surfers with 800 x 600 too

They all (allmost 50%) hate the side scrolling.

Executter · Post by **Executter** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 03:33

no. the standard is 1024x786.
in every statistic you can see it. most of users got this resolution.

maybe in america and/or england 800x600 is standard. but the side is for germany only

Jari · Post by **Jari** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:01

I live in Sweden

Yes you are right with the standard is 1024x786 and I said it is 50% use 800 x 600

that's not true, it's 37% http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

If you make your website for the resolution of 1024x786 and don't care for 800 x 600 you have a third surfers that you lose at once when they need to side scroll.

Is that worth it ?

Executter · Post by **Executter** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:03

My Customer don't care about the resolution...
it doesn't matter..

all my websites are designed for 1024... and if the user got an lower resolution... he must scroll... the end.

Jari · Post by **Jari** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:10

I make all my websites for my clients also for 1024x786, but I always look so there is no side scroling in 800 x 600.

Why should you not do that ? Why do you make a website and don't care of the third of surfers ?

Executter · Post by **Executter** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:13

because the place of content is much bigger...
arghhhh... i don't want to make a discussion in this thread...

i want positive reactions about the website ^^
if you want to continue our discussion join #executter in quakenet

Jari · Post by **Jari** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:20

Its not the size that matters.

How can you ask what we think about the website if you only want positive response ??

Don't you want to know what we think of the website ?

Why bother to ask if you can't take both negative and positive response ?

That was really stupide

Executter · Post by **Executter** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:24

I want positive response.
Negative response is very good to optimize upcomming projects.

And I will remind if I start the next project, about the resolution

But it don't change any think of my target... to get much positive response...
arghhhh dosn't matter... it's 4:30 am ... i'm tiered ^^

spirelli · Post by **spirelli** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:28

I agree with Jari. Almost 40% of unsers with 800x600 is too large a number for me to ignore. If it was 5% I woudn't care.
It really does not look that great in 800x600. So for 40% something not looking great is not good enough.

Executter · Post by **Executter** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:30

now don't only blame the resolution ...

spirelli · Post by **spirelli** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:40

Executter wrote:now don't only blame the resolution ...

??? what does that mean?? I blame you.

Otherwise I think the site looks very good so far!! Well done.
The only bit I have to critisize are the Navigation arrows, which I find do not relate to any of the other design elements on the page visually.
"Sie befinden sich hier: " I find is unnecessary clutter (uppart from the fact that it is not clear on first sight whether it relates to the 'Home' on the right or to the navigation).
The word 'Navigation' and the actual navigation items should be aligned maybe.
"Created by Executter Software Solutions" link does not work.
Otherwise -as I said - nice site.

Executter · Post by **Executter** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 04:44

hehe ^^
but thanks... i forgot uploading the exit.php *ggg*

THX for that and for your opinion.

Edit: Don't try visiting my homepage... in the earl morning it never works...
i paid only 3 EUR per month for much features and the domain... it's cheap... you see (or not^^)

Jari · Post by **Jari** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 05:06

I can second that

I make the websites for 1024... but I always look so it looks good in 800... too.

I try to optimize the websites for both, I would never ignore the fact a third has 800...

Kosse · Post by **Kosse** » Thu 20. Jan 2005, 11:50

besides the 800 wtopic wich I agree with,
the site is cool, I like it, though for an expert's eye it is PHPWCMS, no doubt

The banners are nice, good integrated colors.

What about the bottom line? I don't like it that much...

BBS Technik Koblenz | Beatusstr. 143-147 | 56073 Koblenz
© by BBS Technik Koblenz 2005 | Created by Executter Software Solutions | Admin

Can that be like more "integrated" to the page? It kinda floats to me.
Otherwise, as I said, I like it, clean, pro, technical.

Contents? Even if it is your customer's reponsability, shouldn't you "lore ipsum" it, so you can have the general view of what it looks like with contents? We know clients can be pretty "creative"

when it comes to choose their colors or links. Then you end up with a messy design because they chose ... eer, pink links. You get my point?

Cheers